The Ethics of Pacemaker Deactivation

Date de l'article :
2011-08-18
Auteurs :
Michael B. Bevins, MD, PhD
Affiliations :
Central Texas Palliative Care Associates, Hospice Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Source :
1106 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Vol. 41 No. 6 June 2011
Abstract :
A core principle of American medical ethics holds that an informed and capacitated patient has the right to have treatments withdrawn or withheld. Nevertheless, many clinicians remain reluctant to honor a request to deactivate a patient’s pacemaker. This article describes a case in which a patient was denied her request for pacemaker deactivation. Several reasons for this reluctance are discussed, including historical, practical, and ethical considerations for opposing pacemaker deactivation. Ultimately, however, from an ethical standpoint, pacemaker deactivation is similar to withdrawal of other therapies. Fortunately, a recent expert consensus statement supports a patient’s right to have her pacemaker deactivated. Pacemaker deactivation should only be performed after robust informed consent, which must include discussion of risks, benefits, and all viable alternatives based on the patient’s values and goals. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;41:1106e1110.
Commentaires :
Très belle réflection éthique sur la place des pace makers en phase terminale et toute discussion éclairée qui doit être prévue avec le patient , ses proches et les intervenants